If you have osteoarthritis — most commonly in the knee, hip, or hands — you may have heard about injections into the joint. This page explains the three main types, what the Australian evidence says about each, and questions worth asking your GP.
Key evidence (HA): Pereira et al, BMJ 2022 — 169 RCTs, 21,163 participants. Pre-specified main analysis (24 trials ≥100/arm, 8,702 participants): pain reduction 2.0mm (95% CI 0.5–3.8) on 100mm VAS at 3 months. Function: 1.2 points (95% CI 0.6–2.0) on WOMAC 0–68. Trial sequential analysis: conclusive evidence of no benefit existed from 2009.
Key evidence (corticosteroid): Cochrane 2015 (27 trials, 1,767 participants) — low-certainty evidence of small-to-moderate benefit for knee OA. Confirmed by subsequent high-quality RCTs. Proven benefit at hip. UK CPRD cohort (163,241 patients) found reduced subsequent pain medication use.
Key evidence (PRP): Bennell et al, JAMA 2021 (RESTORE trial, 288 participants) — no clinically important benefit at 12 months for mild-to-moderate knee OA vs placebo.
Key evidence (stem cells): Cochrane 2025 (25 trials, 1,341 participants) — low-certainty evidence of slight improvement in pain/function. Safety uncertain.
Shared decision-making: Acknowledge the patient's symptoms and preferences. Explain why HA is not recommended care. Most patients will then opt not to proceed. Development of a formal decision aid has been recommended.
MBS note: MBS specifically precludes a benefit for consultation associated with injection of HA products. MBS subsidy application (2003) and PBS subsidy application (2006) for HA were both rejected. HA products are classified as TGA Class III medical devices, not drugs.
Adverse event reporting: HA products for intra-articular injection are registered as medical devices. Reporting adverse events to the TGA remains important — TGA adverse event reporting.