Punch, shave, saucerization, or ellipse? Select the lesion type below for a recommended technique.
Shave biopsy: thin disk of epidermis + upper dermis, under 1mm deep. Suits warts, papillomas, skin tags, superficial BCC/SCC, seborrhoeic/actinic keratoses. Not appropriate for suspicious pigmented lesions. Preferred over techniques needing sutures on the foot.
Saucerization (deep scoop shave): extends to mid-dermis/subcutaneous fat (1–4mm deep). Good for wider pigmented lesions or lesions hard to excise by ellipse for cosmetic/location reasons. Smaller, rounder scar than ellipse; useful on sites prone to hypertrophic scarring (upper back, shoulders, anterior chest, upper arms, lower legs, ears).
Punch biopsy: full-thickness, narrow and deep. Good for inflammatory/bullous lesions, panniculitis, dysplastic/complex naevi too large to excise, and scalp/follicle sampling. Can remove lesions 1–4mm entirely (excisional use). Orient perpendicular to Langer lines for an oval that closes more easily. Narrow specimen may be inadequate for pigmented lesion staging.
Elliptical (fusiform) excision: the most complete excisional option and the conventional choice for suspicious lesions — more invasive and time-consuming than saucerization, but gives the fullest specimen.
Consider referral for lesions on the eyelids, nose, palms, or soles — these sites carry higher functional/cosmetic stakes and are often better handled by someone experienced in that site.
Be cautious biopsying patients with bleeding disorders or on medications affecting haemostasis — plan haemostasis technique in advance.
On the foot, a shave biopsy (not requiring sutures) is often preferred over techniques needing closure, given tension and healing considerations.